Skip to main content

U.S. Government Enforces New Immigration Rule: Mandatory Registration for Foreign Nationals Staying Over 30 Days


The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has implemented a significant update to immigration enforcement policy. According to the latest directive, foreign nationals residing in the United States for more than 30 days are now legally required to register with the federal government. Failure to comply may lead to substantial legal consequences, including fines, imprisonment, and long-term bans on future legal immigration.

Official Statement from DHS

In a statement released on Saturday, the DHS confirmed:

“Foreign nationals present in the U.S. longer than 30 days must register with the federal government. Failure to comply is a crime punishable by fines and imprisonment.”

This measure is part of a broader initiative led by President Donald Trump and Secretary of Homeland Security Krishi Noem to enhance enforcement against illegal immigration. A message posted on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) further emphasized the administration's position, stating:
“POTUS Trump and Sec_Noem have a clear message to illegal aliens: LEAVE NOW and self-deport.”

Individuals Potentially Affected

While this regulation does not immediately impact lawful visa holders, it specifically targets individuals who are in violation of U.S. immigration laws. This includes:

  • Foreign nationals who have overstayed their visas.

  • H-1B visa holders who remain in the U.S. after their employment has ended and the grace period has lapsed.

  • International students who are no longer in compliance with their visa conditions.

  • Undocumented individuals residing in the country without official status or registration.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The Department of Homeland Security has outlined the following penalties for those who fail to register or self-deport:

  • A daily fine of $998 for those who remain in the country after receiving a final order of removal.

  • Fines ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 for individuals who agree to self-deport but fail to leave.

  • Possible imprisonment for continued non-compliance.

  • A permanent ban on future legal immigration to the United States.

Voluntary Self-Deportation Encouraged

In its communication, the DHS is actively encouraging self-deportation for those currently residing in the United States without legal authorization. The department has listed several benefits to voluntary departure:

  • The ability to select one’s own departure date and avoid criminal proceedings.

  • The possibility of retaining lawfully earned income, provided no criminal charges are pending.

  • Eligibility for subsidized airfare for those unable to afford travel expenses.

  • Preserving future eligibility for legal immigration pathways.

Judicial Backing and Policy Enforcement

This directive follows a ruling by a U.S. District Judge authorizing the federal government to move forward with enforcement. The ruling also permits the requirement for all undocumented residents to register with authorities and carry proper documentation at all times.

Conclusion

The latest directive from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security underscores the federal government’s intent to strengthen immigration enforcement. While lawful residents maintaining visa compliance are not currently affected, foreign nationals living without authorization or beyond their permitted stay are strongly advised to comply with the new registration requirement or consider voluntary departure to avoid legal consequences.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only. For legal advice regarding immigration status, individuals should consult a qualified immigration attorney.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shashi Tharoor Admits Misjudgment on India’s Neutral Stance in Russia-Ukraine War

Congress leader and Member of Parliament Shashi Tharoor has publicly acknowledged that he was mistaken in opposing India’s neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine war when it first erupted in 2022. Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi on Tuesday during a session titled ‘Waging Peace: Looking Back to Look Ahead’ , Tharoor candidly admitted that India’s diplomatic approach has, in hindsight, positioned the country as a potential peacemaker on the global stage. "An Egg on My Face" – Tharoor’s Honest Reflection "I am still wiping the egg off my face because I am one person in the parliamentary debate who actually criticized the Indian position at the time back in February 2022," Tharoor confessed. At the time, he had strongly condemned Russia’s military actions, advocating that India should denounce the aggression based on principles of the UN Charter, the sovereignty of Ukraine, and the inviolability of international borders . However, with three years of g...
Post a Comment
Read more

British MP Wera Hobhouse Denied Entry to Hong Kong: A Diplomatic Incident with No Explanation

In a deeply troubling turn of events, British Member of Parliament (MP) Wera Hobhouse was denied entry to Hong Kong while on a personal trip to visit her newborn grandson and son. Hobhouse, a member of the opposition Liberal Democrat party, shared her dismay on social media, revealing that authorities provided no explanation for their actions. "Authorities gave me no explanation for this cruel and upsetting blow," Hobhouse said, expressing her frustration over the situation. The incident has garnered significant attention in the UK, with British officials voicing their concerns over what they perceive as a politically motivated move. Foreign Minister David Lammy expressed his distress over the matter, emphasizing that the British government would seek answers from both Hong Kong and Chinese authorities. "It is deeply concerning to hear that an MP on a personal trip has been refused entry to Hong Kong," Lammy said. "We will urgently raise this with the authorit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delhi High Court Denies Maintenance to Educated Wife: A Landmark Ruling

  In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court held that a well-educated woman, capable of earning a living, should not remain unemployed just to claim maintenance from her husband. The ruling came in response to a revision petition filed by a woman challenging a family court’s 2022 decision that denied her interim maintenance. The Court’s Stand on Maintenance Justice Chandra Dhari Singh stated that Section 125 of the CrPC aims to protect dependent spouses, children, and parents but does not encourage idleness. He asserted that women with professional qualifications and work experience should make efforts to become financially independent rather than relying on alimony. The court upheld the family court’s decision, noting that the petitioner had a Master’s degree in International Business from the University of Wollongong, Australia , which demonstrated her capability to earn. Furthermore, she had previously worked in Dubai as an Audit Associate at KPMG and later as an HR Manage...
Post a Comment
Read more