Skip to main content

PM Modi on 2002 Gujarat Riots: "A Tragedy of Unimaginable Magnitude"






In a recent interview with US computer scientist and podcast host Lex Fridman, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the 2002 Gujarat riots, offering his perspective on the events and the historical context surrounding them. The discussion, part of a three-hour-long podcast, touched on the challenges Gujarat faced before 2002 and the transformation the state underwent under his leadership.


The Context Leading to the 2002 Riots


PM Modi described the 2002 Sabarmati Express attack in Gujarat’s Godhra as a "tragedy of unimaginable magnitude," emphasizing that the violence that followed was tragic for everyone. However, he argued that Gujarat had a long history of communal riots even before 2002, with over 250 recorded instances of communal violence.


He also linked the atmosphere of unrest to global and national events that preceded the riots, such as the Kandahar hijacking (1999), the 9/11 terrorist attacks (2001), the attack on the J&K Assembly, and the Indian Parliament attack (2001). According to PM Modi, these incidents created a volatile environment where even a minor spark could escalate into large-scale violence.


PM Modi’s Leadership Amidst Crisis


PM Modi recalled that he had no prior experience in government when he was appointed Gujarat’s Chief Minister. His tenure began amid a massive earthquake in Bhuj, requiring extensive rehabilitation efforts. Just days after he became an elected representative, the Godhra train burning incident occurred, setting off the tragic events that followed.


He acknowledged the widespread perception that the 2002 riots were Gujarat's worst communal incident but pointed out that past riots, such as the 1969 riots that lasted nearly six months, were equally devastating. However, he emphasized that Gujarat has not witnessed a single communal riot since 2002, attributing this to his administration’s policies.


Justice and Political Narratives


PM Modi strongly asserted that the judiciary had thoroughly investigated the events of 2002 and found him innocent. Despite political opponents trying to hold him responsible, he stated that the courts analyzed the situation meticulously, even under a government that was politically opposed to him at the time.


He described the shift in Gujarat’s governance from communal tension to a development-oriented approach, encapsulated by the slogan "Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas" (Together with all, Development for all, Trust of all).


Conclusion


The 2002 Gujarat riots remain a significant chapter in India’s modern history, shaping political narratives and public discourse for decades. In his interview, PM Modi presented his version of events, emphasizing the historical context, the challenges of governance, and the steps taken to ensure lasting peace in Gujarat.


The discussion with Lex Fridman not only revisited past events but also highlighted PM Modi’s broader vision of development over appeasement politics. Whether one agrees with his perspective or not, the interview sheds light on how he views one of the most controversial periods of his political career.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shashi Tharoor Admits Misjudgment on India’s Neutral Stance in Russia-Ukraine War

Congress leader and Member of Parliament Shashi Tharoor has publicly acknowledged that he was mistaken in opposing India’s neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine war when it first erupted in 2022. Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi on Tuesday during a session titled ‘Waging Peace: Looking Back to Look Ahead’ , Tharoor candidly admitted that India’s diplomatic approach has, in hindsight, positioned the country as a potential peacemaker on the global stage. "An Egg on My Face" – Tharoor’s Honest Reflection "I am still wiping the egg off my face because I am one person in the parliamentary debate who actually criticized the Indian position at the time back in February 2022," Tharoor confessed. At the time, he had strongly condemned Russia’s military actions, advocating that India should denounce the aggression based on principles of the UN Charter, the sovereignty of Ukraine, and the inviolability of international borders . However, with three years of g...

British MP Wera Hobhouse Denied Entry to Hong Kong: A Diplomatic Incident with No Explanation

In a deeply troubling turn of events, British Member of Parliament (MP) Wera Hobhouse was denied entry to Hong Kong while on a personal trip to visit her newborn grandson and son. Hobhouse, a member of the opposition Liberal Democrat party, shared her dismay on social media, revealing that authorities provided no explanation for their actions. "Authorities gave me no explanation for this cruel and upsetting blow," Hobhouse said, expressing her frustration over the situation. The incident has garnered significant attention in the UK, with British officials voicing their concerns over what they perceive as a politically motivated move. Foreign Minister David Lammy expressed his distress over the matter, emphasizing that the British government would seek answers from both Hong Kong and Chinese authorities. "It is deeply concerning to hear that an MP on a personal trip has been refused entry to Hong Kong," Lammy said. "We will urgently raise this with the authorit...

Delhi High Court Denies Maintenance to Educated Wife: A Landmark Ruling

  In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court held that a well-educated woman, capable of earning a living, should not remain unemployed just to claim maintenance from her husband. The ruling came in response to a revision petition filed by a woman challenging a family court’s 2022 decision that denied her interim maintenance. The Court’s Stand on Maintenance Justice Chandra Dhari Singh stated that Section 125 of the CrPC aims to protect dependent spouses, children, and parents but does not encourage idleness. He asserted that women with professional qualifications and work experience should make efforts to become financially independent rather than relying on alimony. The court upheld the family court’s decision, noting that the petitioner had a Master’s degree in International Business from the University of Wollongong, Australia , which demonstrated her capability to earn. Furthermore, she had previously worked in Dubai as an Audit Associate at KPMG and later as an HR Manage...