Skip to main content

Why US Deportation Flights to Amritsar Have Touched Off a Firestorm in Punjab


The landing of deportation flights from the United States carrying Indian immigrants has ignited a firestorm of political and social unrest in Punjab. With the first flight arriving on February 5, 2025, and another expected to land soon, the issue has sparked sharp disagreements between political parties, and has raised significant concerns among the people of Punjab.

The controversy centers around the choice of Amritsar as the landing site for these flights. Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), has condemned the move, accusing the BJP-led central government of deliberately tarnishing the image of Punjab and its people. According to Mann, the selection of Amritsar is part of a "smear campaign" that aims to falsely portray illegal immigration as an issue that is solely tied to Punjab.

Mann’s criticism became particularly pointed following the arrival of the first flight, which carried 104 deportees—30 of whom were from Punjab. Images of the deportees being flown back in handcuffs and shackles stirred outrage, with critics calling the situation “inhumane.” To add to the tension, the deportees were transported on a US military plane, an arrangement that further fueled the firestorm. In a scathing rebuke, Mann drew a parallel between Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s diplomatic relations with US President Donald Trump and the treatment of deported Indians, calling it a “return gift” from Trump to Modi.

AAP’s Stance: A Conspiracy Against Punjab

The AAP has taken a strong stand against the deportation flights, accusing the Centre of an “anti-Punjab” bias. AAP leader Aman Arora has voiced similar concerns, describing the flights as part of a broader effort to “defame” Punjab. He pointed to the fact that many deportees come from states like Gujarat and Haryana, yet Amritsar alone seems to bear the brunt of the criticism. The AAP’s stance resonates with various farmer groups and civil society organizations, who argue that Punjab has been unfairly targeted by the BJP, especially in the absence of a BJP-majority government in the state.

Among those who share this sentiment is Sukhwinder Kaur, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Krantikari), who believes that the BJP is sidelining Punjab because of its lack of political dominance there. The issue, Kaur and others argue, is part of a larger political narrative that seeks to scapegoat the state for the challenges faced by Indian immigrants, ignoring the broader social and economic factors driving migration in the first place.

Economic Crisis and Migration

One of the key issues underlying this debate is the economic crisis that has gripped Punjab. Jagjit Singh Dallewal of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha has pointed out that illegal immigration is not an isolated issue. Many young people from Punjab are leaving in search of better opportunities, driven largely by the economic distress in the state. The collapse of the agricultural sector and the lack of viable job prospects have led many to look abroad, particularly to the United States, as a means of escape.

For Dallewal and other activists, the focus should not solely be on deportations but on addressing the root causes of illegal migration. They argue that ensuring fair wages and better opportunities for self-employment within India is crucial to preventing the mass exodus of Punjab's youth. The demand for a legal guarantee of Minimum Support Price (MSP) for crops is one of the key planks in the ongoing farmers' protests, and is seen as a necessary step to provide economic stability and prevent further migration.

The BJP's Response: Deflecting the Real Issue

While AAP has accused the Centre of scapegoating Punjab, BJP leaders have firmly rejected these claims. Subhash Sharma, Punjab BJP vice-president, argues that the AAP is trying to deflect attention from the real issue—illegal immigration. “Is Amritsar not a part of the country?” Sharma asked, stressing that the choice of landing site is inconsequential to the larger question of why illegal migration is occurring in the first place.

The BJP accuses the AAP of building a “false narrative” and focusing on irrelevant issues instead of addressing the root cause of migration. Sharma and other BJP leaders point to various positive initiatives taken by the Modi government for Punjab, such as the opening of the Kartarpur Sahib corridor, and the recently achieved justice in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, where former Congress leader Sajjan Kumar was convicted. They believe that these initiatives are signs of the BJP’s commitment to Punjab and its people, and that the AAP's claims are simply a distraction from the government's real work.

Public Sentiment: Amritsar's Role in the Debate

Beyond the political squabbles, the issue of Amritsar as the chosen landing site for deportees is a source of frustration for many in Punjab. Residents like Jaskirat Singh, a Ludhiana-based software engineer, express concern that this pattern reinforces the stereotype that Punjabis are the primary culprits of illegal immigration. “It sends the wrong message,” Singh said, “as deportees come from all over India, not just Punjab. The national capital should have been chosen to avoid such controversy.”

Even within the immigration consultancy community, there is growing discontent over the repeated focus on Amritsar. The general sentiment among locals is that such a spotlight on the city only serves to stigmatize its residents.

Conclusion: The Battle Over Punjab’s Image

The ongoing debate over the deportation flights reveals much about the current political climate in Punjab. It underscores the divide between state and central politics, as well as the growing frustration over the economic challenges that continue to push young Punjabis abroad in search of better opportunities. Whether or not the issue of deportation flights will lead to any substantial change remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the controversy has exposed deep divisions and highlighted the complexities surrounding illegal immigration, economic distress, and the portrayal of Punjab on the national stage.

As the political storm continues to brew, Punjab finds itself once again at the crossroads of a larger debate about identity, justice, and the future of its people. The coming weeks are likely to bring further developments, but for now, the focus remains on whether the state can move beyond the political firestorm and address the fundamental issues that are causing so many of its youth to seek a better life abroad.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shashi Tharoor Admits Misjudgment on India’s Neutral Stance in Russia-Ukraine War

Congress leader and Member of Parliament Shashi Tharoor has publicly acknowledged that he was mistaken in opposing India’s neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine war when it first erupted in 2022. Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi on Tuesday during a session titled ‘Waging Peace: Looking Back to Look Ahead’ , Tharoor candidly admitted that India’s diplomatic approach has, in hindsight, positioned the country as a potential peacemaker on the global stage. "An Egg on My Face" – Tharoor’s Honest Reflection "I am still wiping the egg off my face because I am one person in the parliamentary debate who actually criticized the Indian position at the time back in February 2022," Tharoor confessed. At the time, he had strongly condemned Russia’s military actions, advocating that India should denounce the aggression based on principles of the UN Charter, the sovereignty of Ukraine, and the inviolability of international borders . However, with three years of g...

British MP Wera Hobhouse Denied Entry to Hong Kong: A Diplomatic Incident with No Explanation

In a deeply troubling turn of events, British Member of Parliament (MP) Wera Hobhouse was denied entry to Hong Kong while on a personal trip to visit her newborn grandson and son. Hobhouse, a member of the opposition Liberal Democrat party, shared her dismay on social media, revealing that authorities provided no explanation for their actions. "Authorities gave me no explanation for this cruel and upsetting blow," Hobhouse said, expressing her frustration over the situation. The incident has garnered significant attention in the UK, with British officials voicing their concerns over what they perceive as a politically motivated move. Foreign Minister David Lammy expressed his distress over the matter, emphasizing that the British government would seek answers from both Hong Kong and Chinese authorities. "It is deeply concerning to hear that an MP on a personal trip has been refused entry to Hong Kong," Lammy said. "We will urgently raise this with the authorit...

Delhi High Court Denies Maintenance to Educated Wife: A Landmark Ruling

  In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court held that a well-educated woman, capable of earning a living, should not remain unemployed just to claim maintenance from her husband. The ruling came in response to a revision petition filed by a woman challenging a family court’s 2022 decision that denied her interim maintenance. The Court’s Stand on Maintenance Justice Chandra Dhari Singh stated that Section 125 of the CrPC aims to protect dependent spouses, children, and parents but does not encourage idleness. He asserted that women with professional qualifications and work experience should make efforts to become financially independent rather than relying on alimony. The court upheld the family court’s decision, noting that the petitioner had a Master’s degree in International Business from the University of Wollongong, Australia , which demonstrated her capability to earn. Furthermore, she had previously worked in Dubai as an Audit Associate at KPMG and later as an HR Manage...